Archived Pages from 20th Century!!
THE MINOAN CIVILIZATION
ANCIENT GREECE
ROMAN TIMES / BYZANTIUM
16th-18th CENTURIES
QUEEN AMALIA
BIBLIOGRAPHY
It is possible that the existence of an early
civilization in the Aegean would still be unknown if it had not been for
the German archaeologist HEINRICH SCHLIEMANN. Obsessed since his childhood
by the Homeric tales, he believed unlike his contemporary scholars, that
those tales were accurate historical documents rather than adventure stories.
In 1873, he found Troy and jubilantly set off for Greece where he believed
he would find King Agamemnon�s legendary city: Mycenae. He was proved right.
From Mycenae he moved his sights to Crete, where he stated confidently
he would find the cradle of the Aegean civilization. He was unsuccessful
in his search, but the British archaeologist Sir ARTHUR EVANS following
Schliemann�s hunch, found later the city of Knossos and named his discovery:
The Minoan Civilization.
Crete
is thought to have been inhabited from the sixth millennium B.C. but it
was later, probably around the late fourth-early third millennium that
immigrants from Asia Minor founded a genuine civilization. They brought
with them the technology and organizational flair which transformed a nation
of skin clad cave dwellers into one of the most sophisticated civilizations
of the ancient world.
The climate in Crete is not sufficiently dry to preserve actual examples
of clothing. We have to rely on the evidence of artifacts such as pots,
reliefs, frescoes and statuettes (all of which are predominantly figurative),
in order to determine the dress-type of the time. Terracotta statuettes
provide us with the most valuable guide not only to the shape of dress
but also to the colors and their decorative forms.
The Minoan civilization was at its height between 1750 and 1580 B.C.
(middle period). During this time, the palace at Knossos was built and
the most exciting development at Minoan costume were seen. The palace contains
a complete spinning and weaving shop along with the finest and most significant
statuettes. Many of these are thought to portray goddesses, but others
are clearly of mortals and their dress can be assumed to be that which
was actually worn, at least by the high born.
The most striking feature of these costumes is the technical virtuosity
in the standard of dress-making. Other civilizations of the time relied
more on the fold and arrangement of the fabric than the cut of the garment
itself. The Minoans, however, wore fitted clothes as we know them today.
Women wore skirts that fell straight from the hips and then filled
out to a wide hem. Some experts consider that the lower half of the skirt
was stretched over hoops of rushes, wood or even metal. Others consider
that these were the earliest boned crinolines.
Belts, worn tight accentuated their tiny waists and sometimes carried a
double apron that fell in front and back, over the skirt.
Above the skirt they wore a tight-fitting short sleeved bodice. In most
cases, the breasts were entirely exposed with the bodice laced up below
the bust. Some frescoes, however, suggest that the breasts were in fact
veiled with a transparent bolero top.
Minoan women had an unprecedented love of color and display in their
fabrics. Most designs were geometric, but we also have examples of decorative
themes drawn from nature, using flowers, fish and birds in brilliant colors.
For the first time, we encounter a race of hat-conscious women. Two entirely
different styles are portrayed on the terracottas. One, the shape of an
inverted pot, and the second, a simple beret.
Men, regardless of rank or status, appeared to have favored virtual
nudity. They wore belts with small cloth aprons, loin cloths and even short
skirts.
Shoes for both men and women were exclusively for outdoor wear. This was
deduced from various buildings in Knossos, where the steps leading up to
them were very worn, but this damage stopped abruptly at the door.
The
Minoans and Myceneans greatly developed the art of jewellery-making; among
their finest pieces are seals made of gold.
The picture on the left, shows a male figure accompanied by two females.
Culturally, however, the normal procedure was reversed. Instead of
the conquerors imposing their culture on the conquered, the Myceneans adopted
the Minoan culture. The result: the Mycenean costume is virtually indistinguishable
from the Minoan.
Around 1.200 B.C. waves of Dorian invaders swept into Greece from
Illyria on the east of the Adriatic and brought about the downfall of the
Mycenaean civilization. The following four centuries are known as the "Dark
Age" of Greece. The period started with a civilization of people dressed
in bell-shaped skirts and tightly fitted bodices, and ended with a race
dressed in draped clothes, the costumes we now associate with the Greeks
and the Romans.
From the seventh century B.C. onwards, we have vast quantities of
reference material for the study of costume. Greeks were among the finest
exponents of figurative sculpture. Never before had costume been portrayed
with such meticulous care and precision. Statues, together with untold
numbers of painted pots, give the historian a unique pictorial history
of the development of a nation and its fashions. At the same time, we have
the invaluable contribution of the written word. Such great Greek historians
as Herodotus have given us very detailed descriptions of developments in
fashion and the social significance of costume and their accessories.
During the periods under discussion, generally referred to as Archaic
and Classical, there were two basic styles of costume for both men and
women: Doric, in existence at the beginning of the Archaic period,
and Ionic which was adopted later.
The
most basic garment for women was the Doric peplos, worn universally up
to the beginning of the sixth century B.C.
Made from a rectangle of woven wool, it measured about six feet in width
and about eighteen inches more than the height of the wearer from shoulder
to ankle in length. The fabric was wrapped round the wearer with the excess
material folded over the top. It was then pinned on both shoulders and
the excess material allowed to fall free, giving the impression of a short
cape. The pins used for fastening the shoulders of the peplos were originally
open pins with decorated heads, but they were later replaced by fibulae
or brooches.
Herodotus, explaining this development, tells us a rather macabre
story:
After a disastrous military campaign by the Athenian army, all the forces
were put to death except one man who managed to escape, return to Athens
and tell the women about their husbands' fate.
Devastated the women took the huge pins from their Doric peplos and butchered
the man in anger and contempt.
The men of Athens, Herodotus tells us, were so horrified that they declared
that Ionic dress should be worn in the future.
Whether the story is true is uncertain, but there was for sure a period
when open pins went out of favor.
The
drawing on the left is showing the Doric chiton, the basic garment worn
by Greek women up to the beginning of the sixth century B.C.
It was folded so that there was an overlap of material on the bodice; the
cloth was secured in place (on the shoulders) by pins.
One
way of draping the Doric peplos involved covering the pouching formed by
the belt with another section of the woollen rectangle.
This maiden from the Acropolis dates from the 6th century B.C.
The statue was originally brightly painted.
The Ionic chiton which followed was similar to the Doric peplos in
overall construction. The woolen fabric was replaced by thin linen or occasionally
silk, reflecting the increased influence of Asia Minor on the country.
Again the costume was made from a single rectangle of material but much
wider than that used for the peplos, measuring up to ten feet wide. It
had no surplus material and was measured exactly from shoulder to ankle.
The enormous width required that eight to ten fibulae were needed to fasten
the top edge, leaving an openwork seam either side of the neck which ran
across the shoulders and down the arms to form elbow-length sleeves.
The
garment on the left, the Ionic chiton, was an alternative to the Doric
chiton. The main difference lay in its greater width.
The top edges of the material were fastened on the shoulder with clasps,
so giving the wearer greater opportumity for the display of jewellery.
An other garment worn throughout this period was an outer
garment usually worn by men, the himation. It was also made from
a rectangle of woven wool and started as outdoor wear, but, with the arrival
of the lighter material of the Ionic chiton, it was worn at any time.
At the start of the Archaic period the himation was comparatively small
and worn over the shoulders as a cloak but, as time passed and Greek taste
became more sophisticated, methods of draping it became more elaborate
and its dimensions increased to ten or twelve feet by five feet. When worn
alone, a fashion much favored by philosophers and orators, the draping
of the himation was at its most complex form.
Forms of male dress throughout the Archaic and Classical periods
were very similar to women's. The two basic garments, the chiton and the
himation, were adopted by both sexes. The full-length chiton was worn by
all Greek men until the fifth century B.C. when, except for the elderly,
it was abandoned in favor of a shorter version, which was knee-length.
It was sometimes pinned on the left shoulder only, leaving the right shoulder
and arm free. Soldiers worn a chiton on which both shoulders and arms of
the garment were sewn, leaving a wide slit for the head. It was generally
tied at the waist and a certain amount of material was gathered above the
belt to draw the hem-line to mid-thigh level.
It is a popular
misconception that Greek costumes were white.
This idea most probably arose because most Greek statues are of marble,
bronze, or some other monochromatic material, and even the ones which were
originally polychromatic had lost their colors by the time they were discovered.
During the Archaic period, clothes were generally white or off-white, commoners
were forbidden to wear red chitons and himations in theaters or public
places, but by the fifth century costumes were decorated with a wide range
of colors.
Homer tells us of extravagant costumes woven with threads of silver
and gold.
Pottery, statues and the written word have given us some knowledge
of their decorative themes. One of the most common designs for borders
was the Greek key pattern which has been used as a decorative motif ever
since. More complex borders depicted themes ranging from animals, birds,
and fish to complex battle scenes. The colored threads for these embroideries
appear to have been limitless. Herodotus mentions yellow, violet, indigo,
red and purple in a single garment.
There were no new features introduced
into the conventional dress
during the classical age (5th century B.C.).
In the Hellenistic period that followed, the Greek style of dress
won ascendency among the neighbouring Romans and spread throughout the
Mediterranean, especially among the urban classes.
The tunic was a Roman innovation. It comprised a piece of cloth,
with a slit for the head at its centre point. Although now this garment
was hanging from the shoulders, it was also woven in one piece on a frame-shaped
loom.
The tunic began to develop when the cloth was first woven in the shape
of a cross: when folded in two, the cloth itself formed a pair of sleeves.
Long and short cloaks or mantles were worn over the tunic; just as
people had earlier worn the "himation", so the Romans now wore
the "stole" and "tonga".
In the early Christian times, with the spread of the narrow horizontal
loom, a new garment appears: the dalmatic.
It is fashioned from more than one piece of cloth; its shape is that of
a narrow "tunic" with sleeves sewn onto it and gussets inserted
in the side seams.
This is the garment that survived as an element of local Greek costumes
in the form of the basic undergarment, the chemise.
From now on, once the single piece of cloth was cut to make a "composite"
sewn dress, the way opened to the development of cutting and tailoring
skills that lead in time to the designing of clothes.
It was the Byzantine emperors who conciously allowed themselves to
be influenced by the East, in particular Persia. Their subjects followed,
creating a provincial Byzantine style destined to win over the Ottoman
conquerors who destroyed Constantinople in 1453, but only to be captivated
by the dazzling Byzantine civilization.
However exotic this period of fashion may seem to western European
eyes, it was the elaborate costumes with all their trimmings that merchants
brought back from remote parts of Asia that struck the people of Byzantine
and post-Byzantine times as so outlandish.
The same kind of garments eventually reached the ports of Europe
where they were adopted and modified, only to find their way back to the
countries of their origin or to places lying in between, such as the Balkan
peninsula.
It was the western costume though that mostly influenced the style
of dress worn in the Aegean islands and in the coastal cities of mainland
Greece.
Renaissance fashions based on the full-length dress prevailed there,
to be succeeded by an Aegean version of dhe rococo style.
Many of the travelers who visited Greece between the 16th and 18th
centuries have left us a record of what they observed. Some traces remain,
like fossils, in the costumes of Chios, Siphnos, the northern Sporades,
and also in some of the Dodecanese islands.
The Costume of the 1800s
In 1837, the arrival of the first queen of Greece in Athens, Queen
Amalia, was another milestone in the evolution of costume.
An intelligent woman, she soon realized her attire ought to emulate
that of her oddly dressed people; and so, she created a romantic folksy
court dress, what it became a national Greek costume still known as the
Amalia dress.
It follows the Biedermeier style, with a kaftan (kavadi) top over
which is worn a richly embroidered jacket. It was completed with a cap
or fez, traditionally worn by married women, or with the kalpaki (a toque)
of the unmarried woman, to which was added the black veil donned by Roman
Catholics for going to church.
This dress became the usual attire of all Christian townswomen in
Turkish-occupied as well as liberated Balkan lands as far north as Belgrade.
Local costume held its own in villages situated in the plains, on
the mountains, and by the sea-coast.
It was indeed at this juncture that they seem to have ceased evolving,
just a short while before they began to be abbandoned, in the face of the
second and more powerful wave of western fashion: the fashion estarlished
by Queen Olga (from 1864 on), in alliance with the Greek industrial revolution
which, in the case of clothing, was marked by sewing mashines, fashion
periodicals and embroidery pattern books, and most importantly by the schools
that taught cutting and dress-making skills.
J.Anderson & Madge Garland, A History of Fashion,
Orbis Purlishing, London, 1979.
Max Tilke, Costume Patterns & Designs, A. Zwemmer, Ltd,
London
R. Turner Wilcox,The Dictionary of Costume, The Anchor Press
Ltd, Tiptree, Essex.
Joanna Papantoniou, Greek Women's Dress & Jewelry Past &
Present, Peloponnesian Folklore Foundation, Nafplion, 1985.
Linda Welters, Women's Traditional Costume in Attica,Greece,Peloponnesian
Folklore Foundation, A. Petroulakis, Athens.